PITTSBURGH NATIONAL BANK
PITTSBURGH PA 15265

SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMMING EDUCATION CENTER
COMPILED COURSE EVALUATION

DATE(S) OF CLASS OCT. 3-7. 1983

NAME ATTENDEES INSTRUCTOR VICTORIA ALBANESE
LOCATION/VENDOR SYS-ED COURSE TITLE COMMAND LEVEL CODING

Please give careful thought to answering the following questions. If a questions uses an answer scale, circle the number which most accurately reflects your rating of the course and the instructor.

Thank You.

NOTE CREDIT FOR THIS COURSE IS DEPENDENT ON THE COMPLETION OF THIS FORM.

1. What is your overall evaluation of this course? Unsatisfactory Below Average Satisfactory Good Excellent

4.9

COMMENTS

  One of the best classes I've taken here. More explanation or 1 day course on all tables, etc and how they interact with CICS would have been helpful. Hope I will be able to use it in the near future so I don't forget everything.; Very well informed instructor who conveyed the material well.

OBJECTIVES

2. How well did the course objectives state exactly what you would know or be able to do on completing this course. Unclear Somewhat
Clear		 Very
Clear

4.5
3. To what extent did the course fulfill its objectives Limited Adequate Extensive
4.4

COMMENTS

  We were given about as much information as we could digest in the time frame.; The course was well given.

COURSE CONTENT

4. How would you rate the content of the course? Too
Basic
Advanced		 Satisfactory Just Right
4.8
5. Are there any topics you feel should be added to make this course more meaningful for the next class?

No - but a few extra days of workshop to play with out programs would have been helpful.
6. I feel that I
3 will be able to use much of this material in my job now.
7 will be able to utilize it in the future.
1 will make little use of it.
0 am not sure as to its possible use.

COMMENTS

INSTRUCTOR

7. Was the instructor knowledgeable in subject area? Very Poorly Adequately Exceedingly
5
8. Was the-instructor receptive to student questions? Discourages
Questions		 Open to
Questions		 Welcomes
Questions
5
9. Was the course logically sequenced and continuity maintained between topics? Very
Seldom		 Somewhat Always
4.5
10. How was the pace at which material was presented? Too Slow
/Fast		 Varied Just
Right
4.3
.11. How were the teaching techniques effective in getting the material across?

Very good.; With many examples which were excellent.; Very effective. ; Workshops were good.; They were very good.

Could they be improved?

Overheads would have helped.;
12. Considering all of the above, including your comments, how would you rate this instructor? Poor Satisfactory Excellent
4.9